Aurora, CO vs Clinton, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Aurora
65
#1656 nationally
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Clinton leads in median household income ($102,712 vs $72,342). Aurora leads in walk score (33 vs 28). Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 28.1 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Aurora, CO | Clinton, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 65 (#1656) | 72.7 (#840) |
| Population | 394,934 | 23,588 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $458,582 | $499,279 |
| Median Household Income | $72,342 | $102,712 |
| Average Commute | 28.1 min | 23.9 min |
| Walk Score | 33 | 28 |
| Crime Level | Moderate-High | 2.4 |
| School Rating | 5.4 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 108 | 114 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+20.1 | R+24.9 |
D
65 Score
Aurora, CO
Denver's diverse neighbor
Median Home
$458,582
Population
394,934
Crime
Moderate-High
Schools
C
West
View Aurora, CO →
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →