Bakersfield, CA vs St. Paul, MN
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Bakersfield
66.5
#1531 nationally
St. Paul
66.9
#1493 nationally
St. Paul leads in cost of living index (105 vs 123). Bakersfield leads in crime level (15.2 vs 16.9). Bakersfield leads in median household income ($73,827 vs $69,919).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Bakersfield, CA | St. Paul, MN |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66.5 (#1531) | 66.9 (#1493) |
| Population | 413,381 | 303,820 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $391,030 | $299,582 |
| Median Household Income | $73,827 | $69,919 |
| Average Commute | 23.6 min | 23.1 min |
| Walk Score | 37 | N/A |
| Crime Level | 15.2 | 16.9 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 123 | 105 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+21.1 | D+12.9 |
Data coverage note: St. Paul is missing data for 1 metric that Bakersfield has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D
66.5 Score
Bakersfield, CA
Growing California city with expanding opportunities
Median Home
$391,030
Population
413,381
Crime
High
Walk Score
37
Pacific
View Bakersfield, CA →
D
66.9 Score
St. Paul, MN
Growing Minnesota city with expanding opportunities
Median Home
$299,582
Population
303,820
Crime
High
Median Income
$69,919
Midwest
View St. Paul, MN →
Try a different matchup
Swap Bakersfield for: