Belmont, CA vs Highland, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Belmont
61.6
#1893 nationally
Highland
67.2
#1450 nationally
Highland leads in cost of living index (160 vs 284). Highland leads in crime level (2.6 vs 4.5). Highland leads in average commute (22.7 min vs 29.1 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Belmont, CA | Highland, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.6 (#1893) | 67.2 (#1450) |
| Population | 26,622 | 20,217 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $2,284,322 | $975,621 |
| Median Household Income | $185,944 | $166,429 |
| Average Commute | 29.1 min | 22.7 min |
| Walk Score | 47 | N/A |
| Crime Level | 4.5 | 2.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 284 | 160 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+50.3 | R+39.8 |
Data coverage note: Highland is missing data for 1 metric that Belmont has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D-
61.6 Score
Belmont, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$2,284,322
Population
26,622
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
47
Pacific
View Belmont, CA →
D+
67.2 Score
Highland, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$975,621
Population
20,217
Crime
Low
Median Income
$166,429
West
View Highland, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Belmont for: