Foster City, CA vs Highland, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Foster City
63.9
#1730 nationally
Highland
67.2
#1450 nationally
Highland leads in cost of living index (160 vs 276). Highland leads in average commute (22.7 min vs 32.4 min). Foster City leads in crime level (1.9 vs 2.6).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Foster City, CA | Highland, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.9 (#1730) | 67.2 (#1450) |
| Population | 32,180 | 20,217 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,863,228 | $975,621 |
| Median Household Income | $191,267 | $166,429 |
| Average Commute | 32.4 min | 22.7 min |
| Walk Score | 50 | N/A |
| Crime Level | 1.9 | 2.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 276 | 160 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+50.3 | R+39.8 |
Data coverage note: Highland is missing data for 1 metric that Foster City has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D
63.9 Score
Foster City, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,863,228
Population
32,180
Crime
Low
Walk Score
50
Pacific
View Foster City, CA →
D+
67.2 Score
Highland, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$975,621
Population
20,217
Crime
Low
Median Income
$166,429
West
View Highland, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Foster City for: