Burbank, CA vs Pittsfield, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Burbank
61.8
#1887 nationally
Pittsfield
72.6
#864 nationally
Pittsfield leads in cost of living index (107 vs 191). Burbank leads in walk score (71 vs 40). Pittsfield leads in average commute (17.8 min vs 27.1 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Burbank, CA | Pittsfield, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.8 (#1887) | 72.6 (#864) |
| Population | 102,755 | 43,076 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,191,810 | $313,325 |
| Median Household Income | $91,455 | $66,859 |
| Average Commute | 27.1 min | 17.8 min |
| Walk Score | 71 | 40 |
| Crime Level | 10.7 | 14.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 191 | 107 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+39.9 |
D-
61.8 Score
Burbank, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,191,810
Population
102,755
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
71
Pacific
View Burbank, CA →
C-
72.6 Score
Pittsfield, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$313,325
Population
43,076
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
40
Northeast
View Pittsfield, MA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Burbank for: