Burlingame, CA vs Fulshear, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Burlingame
66.4
#1542 nationally
Fulshear
70.8
#1054 nationally
Fulshear leads in crime level (1.6 vs 5.0). Burlingame leads in average commute (31.5 min vs 39.4 min). Fulshear leads in median household income ($170,602 vs $165,940).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Burlingame, CA | Fulshear, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66.4 (#1542) | 70.8 (#1054) |
| Population | 29,910 | 42,616 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $2,817,833 | $504,786 |
| Median Household Income | $165,940 | $170,602 |
| Average Commute | 31.5 min | 39.4 min |
| Walk Score | 70 | N/A |
| Crime Level | 5.0 | 1.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | N/A | 144 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+50.3 | D+1.6 |
Data coverage note: Fulshear is missing data for 1 metric that Burlingame has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D
66.4 Score
Burlingame, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$2,817,833
Population
29,910
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
70
Pacific
View Burlingame, CA →
C-
70.8 Score
Fulshear, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$504,786
Population
42,616
Crime
Low
Median Income
$170,602
Southwest
View Fulshear, TX →
Try a different matchup
Swap Burlingame for: