Foster City, CA vs Fulshear, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Foster City
63.9
#1730 nationally
Fulshear
70.8
#1054 nationally
Fulshear leads in cost of living index (144 vs 276). Foster City leads in average commute (32.4 min vs 39.4 min). Fulshear leads in crime level (1.6 vs 1.9).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Foster City, CA | Fulshear, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.9 (#1730) | 70.8 (#1054) |
| Population | 32,180 | 42,616 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,863,228 | $504,786 |
| Median Household Income | $191,267 | $170,602 |
| Average Commute | 32.4 min | 39.4 min |
| Walk Score | 50 | N/A |
| Crime Level | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 276 | 144 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+50.3 | D+1.6 |
Data coverage note: Fulshear is missing data for 1 metric that Foster City has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D
63.9 Score
Foster City, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,863,228
Population
32,180
Crime
Low
Walk Score
50
Pacific
View Foster City, CA →
C-
70.8 Score
Fulshear, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$504,786
Population
42,616
Crime
Low
Median Income
$170,602
Southwest
View Fulshear, TX →
Try a different matchup
Swap Foster City for: