Clinton, UT vs Fairfield, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Fairfield
62.9
#1812 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 13.6). Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 32.3 min). Clinton leads in cost of living index (114 vs 151).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Fairfield, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 62.9 (#1812) |
| Population | 23,588 | 120,768 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $605,863 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $98,857 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 32.3 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 37 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 13.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 151 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | D+23.0 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
D-
62.9 Score
Fairfield, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$605,863
Population
120,768
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
37
Pacific
View Fairfield, CA →