Clinton, UT vs Fremont, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Fremont
66.8
#1497 nationally
Clinton leads in cost of living index (114 vs 185). Fremont leads in median household income ($155,342 vs $102,712). Fremont leads in walk score (42 vs 28).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Fremont, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 66.8 (#1497) |
| Population | 23,588 | 230,504 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $1,471,931 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $155,342 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 32.4 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 42 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | Very Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 9 |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 185 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | D+53.6 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
D
66.8 Score
Fremont, CA
East Bay family haven
Median Home
$1,471,931
Population
230,504
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Pacific
View Fremont, CA →