Clinton, UT vs Holladay, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Holladay
69.6
#1185 nationally
Holladay leads in walk score (36 vs 28). Holladay leads in average commute (19.4 min vs 23.9 min). Clinton leads in cost of living index (114 vs 139).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Holladay, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 69.6 (#1185) |
| Population | 23,588 | 30,298 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $851,133 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $106,099 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 19.4 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 36 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 2.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 139 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | D+10.2 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
D+
69.6 Score
Holladay, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$851,133
Population
30,298
Crime
Low
Walk Score
36
West
View Holladay, UT →