Clinton, UT vs Kaysville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Kaysville
69.9
#1154 nationally
Clinton leads in walk score (28 vs 20). Kaysville leads in median household income ($121,867 vs $102,712). Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 2.7).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Kaysville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 69.9 (#1154) |
| Population | 23,588 | 32,941 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $693,528 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $121,867 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 23.6 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 20 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 2.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 123 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | R+24.9 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
D+
69.9 Score
Kaysville, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$693,528
Population
32,941
Crime
Low
Walk Score
20
West
View Kaysville, UT →