Clinton, UT vs Logan, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Logan
74.4
#595 nationally
Clinton leads in median household income ($102,712 vs $52,473). Logan leads in average commute (14.4 min vs 23.9 min). Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 3.8).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Logan, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 74.4 (#595) |
| Population | 23,588 | 55,250 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $395,732 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $52,473 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 14.4 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 40 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 3.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 104 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | R+34.4 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
C
74.4 Score
Logan, UT
Utah community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$395,732
Population
55,250
Crime
Low
Walk Score
40
West
View Logan, UT →