Clinton, UT vs McHenry, IL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
McHenry
74.8
#550 nationally
Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 32.3 min). Clinton leads in median household income ($102,712 vs $83,651). McHenry leads in cost of living index (105 vs 114).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | McHenry, IL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 74.8 (#550) |
| Population | 23,588 | 28,251 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $318,613 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $83,651 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 32.3 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 27 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 2.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 105 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | R+5.3 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
C
74.8 Score
McHenry, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$318,613
Population
28,251
Crime
Low
Walk Score
27
Midwest
View McHenry, IL →