Clinton, UT vs McKinney, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
McKinney
73.5
#726 nationally
Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 30.2 min). Clinton leads in walk score (28 vs 24). McKinney leads in median household income ($108,542 vs $102,712).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | McKinney, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 73.5 (#726) |
| Population | 23,588 | 208,867 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $480,265 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $108,542 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 30.2 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 24 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | Very Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 8.8 |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | R+11.2 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
C
73.5 Score
McKinney, TX
Historic downtown meets modern growth
Median Home
$480,265
Population
208,867
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Southwest
View McKinney, TX →