Clinton, UT vs Mount Pleasant, SC
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Mount Pleasant
67.1
#1462 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 3.5). Clinton leads in walk score (28 vs 22). Clinton leads in cost of living index (114 vs 140).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Mount Pleasant, SC |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 67.1 (#1462) |
| Population | 23,588 | 95,232 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $881,446 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $115,167 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 25.2 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 22 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 3.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 140 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | D+5.7 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
D+
67.1 Score
Mount Pleasant, SC
South Carolina community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$881,446
Population
95,232
Crime
Low
Walk Score
22
Southeast
View Mount Pleasant, SC →
Try a different matchup
Swap Clinton for: