Clinton, UT vs Niagara Falls, NY
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Niagara Falls
78.8
#160 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 13.7). Clinton leads in median household income ($102,712 vs $45,932). Niagara Falls leads in walk score (51 vs 28).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Niagara Falls, NY |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 78.8 (#160) |
| Population | 23,588 | 47,599 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $175,991 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $45,932 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 18.8 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 51 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 13.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 92 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | R+14.9 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
C+
78.8 Score
Niagara Falls, NY
Small New York city with local appeal
Median Home
$175,991
Population
47,599
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
51
Northeast
View Niagara Falls, NY →
Try a different matchup
Swap Clinton for: