Clinton, UT vs Pittsburg, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Pittsburg
62
#1881 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 12.6). Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 39.2 min). Pittsburg leads in walk score (39 vs 28).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Pittsburg, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 62 (#1881) |
| Population | 23,588 | 75,803 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $566,408 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $98,408 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 39.2 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 39 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 12.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 146 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | D+38.0 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
D-
62 Score
Pittsburg, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$566,408
Population
75,803
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
39
Pacific
View Pittsburg, CA →