Clinton, UT vs Winter Park, FL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Winter Park
72.4
#900 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 5.6). Winter Park leads in walk score (44 vs 28). Clinton leads in cost of living index (114 vs 139).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Winter Park, FL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 72.4 (#900) |
| Population | 23,588 | 29,894 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $469,253 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $96,563 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 23.1 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 44 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 5.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 139 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | D+13.6 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
C-
72.4 Score
Winter Park, FL
Small Florida city with local appeal
Median Home
$469,253
Population
29,894
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
44
Southeast
View Winter Park, FL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Clinton for: