Fairfield, CA vs Kaysville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fairfield
62.9
#1812 nationally
Kaysville
69.9
#1154 nationally
Kaysville leads in crime level (2.7 vs 13.6). Fairfield leads in walk score (37 vs 20). Kaysville leads in average commute (23.6 min vs 32.3 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fairfield, CA | Kaysville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.9 (#1812) | 69.9 (#1154) |
| Population | 120,768 | 32,941 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $605,863 | $693,528 |
| Median Household Income | $98,857 | $121,867 |
| Average Commute | 32.3 min | 23.6 min |
| Walk Score | 37 | 20 |
| Crime Level | 13.6 | 2.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 151 | 123 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+23.0 | R+24.9 |
D-
62.9 Score
Fairfield, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$605,863
Population
120,768
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
37
Pacific
View Fairfield, CA →
D+
69.9 Score
Kaysville, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$693,528
Population
32,941
Crime
Low
Walk Score
20
West
View Kaysville, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Fairfield for: