Fresno, CA vs Grayslake, IL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fresno
66.6
#1521 nationally
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 20.1). Grayslake leads in median household income ($110,662 vs $63,001). Fresno leads in walk score (47 vs 28).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fresno, CA | Grayslake, IL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66.6 (#1521) | 76.3 (#362) |
| Population | 545,716 | 20,954 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $390,993 | $374,561 |
| Median Household Income | $63,001 | $110,662 |
| Average Commute | 22.3 min | 28.7 min |
| Walk Score | 47 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 20.1 | 1.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 123 | 108 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+4.4 | D+20.8 |
D
66.6 Score
Fresno, CA
Major California city with a diverse economy
Median Home
$390,993
Population
545,716
Crime
High
Walk Score
47
Pacific
View Fresno, CA →
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →