Grayslake, IL vs Sanger, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Sanger
68
#1364 nationally
Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 13.3). Sanger leads in walk score (48 vs 28). Grayslake leads in median household income ($110,662 vs $69,333).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Grayslake, IL | Sanger, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.3 (#362) | 68 (#1364) |
| Population | 20,954 | 26,343 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $374,561 | $416,982 |
| Median Household Income | $110,662 | $69,333 |
| Average Commute | 28.7 min | 24.1 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 48 |
| Crime Level | 1.8 | 13.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 108 | 120 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+20.8 | R+4.4 |
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
D+
68 Score
Sanger, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$416,982
Population
26,343
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
48
Pacific
View Sanger, CA →