Gallatin, TN vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Gallatin
68.5
#1311 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 24). Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $68,548). Gallatin leads in cost of living index (107 vs 159).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Gallatin, TN | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 68.5 (#1311) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 50,355 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $438,486 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $68,548 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 26 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 24 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 5.7 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 107 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+41.8 | R+2.1 |
D+
68.5 Score
Gallatin, TN
Tennessee community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$438,486
Population
50,355
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
24
Southeast
View Gallatin, TN →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Gallatin for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: