Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Springfield, TN
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Springfield
64.9
#1671 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $55,392). Springfield leads in cost of living index (94 vs 159). Rancho Cucamonga leads in crime level (8.0 vs 10.7).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | Springfield, TN |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63 (#1806) | 64.9 (#1671) |
| Population | 174,405 | 19,494 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $788,806 | $331,929 |
| Median Household Income | $105,534 | $55,392 |
| Average Commute | 33 min | 25.5 min |
| Walk Score | 41 | N/A |
| Crime Level | 8.0 | 10.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 159 | 94 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+2.1 | R+50.9 |
Data coverage note: Springfield is missing data for 1 metric that Rancho Cucamonga has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
D
64.9 Score
Springfield, TN
Small Tennessee city with local appeal
Median Home
$331,929
Population
19,494
Crime
Moderate-High
Median Income
$55,392
Southeast
View Springfield, TN →
Try a different matchup
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: