Anna, TX vs Clinton, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Anna
70.9
#1041 nationally
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 4.5). Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 30.3 min). Clinton leads in median household income ($102,712 vs $93,785).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Anna, TX | Clinton, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 70.9 (#1041) | 72.7 (#840) |
| Population | 27,501 | 23,588 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $345,078 | $499,279 |
| Median Household Income | $93,785 | $102,712 |
| Average Commute | 30.3 min | 23.9 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | 28 |
| Crime Level | 4.5 | 2.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 111 | 114 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+11.2 | R+24.9 |
Data coverage note: Anna is missing data for 1 metric that Clinton has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
C-
70.9 Score
Anna, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$345,078
Population
27,501
Crime
Moderate-Low
Median Income
$93,785
Southwest
View Anna, TX →
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →