Ansonia, CT vs Clinton, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Ansonia
73.2
#763 nationally
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Clinton leads in median household income ($102,712 vs $67,474). Ansonia leads in walk score (38 vs 28). Ansonia leads in crime level (1.9 vs 2.4).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Ansonia, CT | Clinton, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 73.2 (#763) | 72.7 (#840) |
| Population | 19,008 | 23,588 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $387,219 | $499,279 |
| Median Household Income | $67,474 | $102,712 |
| Average Commute | 24.4 min | 23.9 min |
| Walk Score | 38 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 1.9 | 2.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 111 | 114 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | N/A | R+24.9 |
C
73.2 Score
Ansonia, CT
Small Connecticut city with local appeal
Median Home
$387,219
Population
19,008
Crime
Low
Walk Score
38
Northeast
View Ansonia, CT →
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →