Clinton, UT vs New Haven, CT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
New Haven
71.4
#985 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 14.7). New Haven leads in walk score (68 vs 28). Clinton leads in median household income ($102,712 vs $54,305).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | New Haven, CT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 71.4 (#985) |
| Population | 23,588 | 135,319 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $338,157 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $54,305 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 21.7 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 68 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 14.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 113 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | N/A |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
C-
71.4 Score
New Haven, CT
Mid-size Connecticut city with community character
Median Home
$338,157
Population
135,319
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
68
Northeast
View New Haven, CT →