Bozeman, MT vs Clinton, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Bozeman
65.6
#1621 nationally
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 11.9). Bozeman leads in walk score (47 vs 28). Bozeman leads in average commute (15.1 min vs 23.9 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Bozeman, MT | Clinton, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 65.6 (#1621) | 72.7 (#840) |
| Population | 57,305 | 23,588 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $727,000 | $499,279 |
| Median Household Income | $74,113 | $102,712 |
| Average Commute | 15.1 min | 23.9 min |
| Walk Score | 47 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 11.9 | 2.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 128 | 114 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+3.2 | R+24.9 |
D
65.6 Score
Bozeman, MT
Montana community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$727,000
Population
57,305
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
47
West
View Bozeman, MT →
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Bozeman for: