Chino, CA vs Clinton, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Chino
63
#1802 nationally
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 8.2). Chino leads in walk score (44 vs 28). Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 34.2 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Chino, CA | Clinton, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63 (#1802) | 72.7 (#840) |
| Population | 93,114 | 23,588 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $755,615 | $499,279 |
| Median Household Income | $99,385 | $102,712 |
| Average Commute | 34.2 min | 23.9 min |
| Walk Score | 44 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 8.2 | 2.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 154 | 114 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+2.1 | R+24.9 |
D
63 Score
Chino, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$755,615
Population
93,114
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
44
Pacific
View Chino, CA →
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →