Clinton, UT vs Parker, CO
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Parker
67.7
#1395 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 5.7). Clinton leads in walk score (28 vs 21). Clinton leads in cost of living index (114 vs 142).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Parker, CO |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 67.7 (#1395) |
| Population | 23,588 | 62,743 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $682,918 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $126,615 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 26.4 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 21 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 5.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 142 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | R+7.0 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
D+
67.7 Score
Parker, CO
Colorado community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$682,918
Population
62,743
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
21
West
View Parker, CO →